Cooking the Story Books

trufflesI spent yesterday afternoon editing a story for the umpteenth time, and Peter pointed out how my approach to writing  was not unlike my cooking.
I thought it an odd analogy, but thinking about it he could have something there.


Most authors  tend to follow their own pattern.

Some put in a huge amount  of prep work with detailed outlines and set procedures to be followed, which produce exact the kind of prose that they had in mind. Theirs is a method born of meticulous  pre-planning.

Others are happier crashing  around in the muck and bullets, researching and revising as they go along.

Neither  is right or wrong, just different, though I suspect the former is a more efficient use of time. But both require a basic outline in the first instance, and in the  revising/editing process  these two  mindsets often run along parallel lines. A word added here, a phrase altered there.  Returning to the cooking metaphor this is the basting, seasoning and presentation that turn mere cooking into a taste sensation as  the tweaking (editing) begins and where my editing and cooking methods meld. Taking that tried and tested formula and rejigging the flavours and nuances. I have the notion that I share that twitchy need to make ‘just one final adjustment’ with most writers – be they pre-planners or freefallers.

Of course the main advantage writing has over cooking is that when an ingredient spoils the effect  it can simply be removed without the tedious process of starting from scratch.

I am one of the seat-of-the-pants variety whether that be at the keyboard or in the kitchen – starting out with a recipe (basic story) and the adding this or substituting that – either because I haven’t checked the store cupboard (research) before I started  out and find I don’t have X or Y (the story I want to tell  doesn’t fit the facts)
or simply because I don’t like how it tasting and experiment with a close alternative. (Kill off a character or rip it up and and start again). Of course this can all backfire in a big way, with abject disasters resigned to the bin, but mostly it works.

When on occasion the end result is exceptional it is sods law that  I cannot remember what it was that I ‘changed’ in order to duplicate the result but that’s the risk factor in seat of the pants editing.

To use that well worn culinary cliche  the proof  is in the eating.










Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s